A
Receiver Can Help
back
to articles
Catch a Falling Property
by Steven Linkon, Esq.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
A court appointed
receiver can be an important element of the foreclosure process.
The receiver can collect rents and ensure against borrower mischief
against the property. A receiver is also useful where the foreclosing
lender prefers not to take title to the property, and instead
permits the receiver to sell the property to a third party with
the proceeds applied to pay off the loan. A sale by the receiver
saves the lender from coming into the chain of title and is advantageous
where the property is impacted by environmental issues, severe
deferred maintainance, or other legal issues that may subject
an owner of record to legal liability.
But there are costs to having a receiver appointed.
The lender's costs to have a receiver appointed include the legal
fees to prepare and present a motion to the court; plus the cost
of bonds that the court may require. At the end of the case more
legal fess wil be expended to obtain the receiver's discharge
and approve the receiver's final report and account.
The receiver also
charges a fee and these are highly negotiable and variable. The
best deal is one where the receiver charges a percentage of the
rents collected, such that the cost of having the receiver is
no greater than if there were an outside property manager in place,
which is essentially what the receiver becomes. This arrangement
is best suited to uncomplicated property requiring ordinary management
until a foreclosure sale can be completed.
If extraordinary management is required, the receiver will want
to charge an hourly fee, either in lieu of or in addition to a
property management fee calculated on the rents collected.
The receiver is also entitled, with court approval, to retain
counsel. The fees of the receiver's counsel can become a significant
cost of the receivership. Accordingly, in ordinary non-contested
situations, the lender will permit its attorney to bring motions
on behalf of the receiver, such as motions for instructions or
to borrow funds. This practice is not desirable where the foreclosure
action is contested by the borrower, or other borrower litigation
is ongoing or anticipated. In these situations, it is necessary
that the receiver obtain separate counsel so that the receiver's
indepenence is unquestioned.
Payment of Receivership Costs
Generally, the costs of the receivership, including the receiver's
fees and the fees of receiver's counsel are recovered from the
income generated by the property subject to the receivership.
The receiver simply deducts the receivership costs from the rents
collected. If the income from the receivership is insufficient
to pay the receivership costs then there is a deficit. The court
has several options available to address the deficit.
First, the receiver is not permitted to incur obligations that
are likely to result in a deficit to the receivership estate.
So before a deficit situation arises the receiver will raise this
issue with the court and seek instructions. The court could authorize
the receiver to borrow money to fund the receivership. Usually,
these loans come from the foreclosing lender.
The court has the power to charge expenses against partnership
property in receivership or to either of the parties exclusively
or by allocating expense between them in equitable proportions.
As a practical matter, the court will usually impose the cost
of the receivership on the party who moved for the appointment
and presumably derived the bulk of the benefits flowing from the
receiver's appointment.
The costs of a receivership can increase dramatically if the
receiver is sued.
The receiver's role in a foreclosure action does not cease when
the property is sold, or when the underlying case is dismissed.
The receiver's obligations continune until the court approves
the receiver's final account and the receiver is discharged. Claims
may be made against the receiver up until the time the receiver
seeks to be discharged. These claims may become yet another expense
of the receivership. And they may be borne by the lender if there
is a deficit in the receivership estate.
The possibility that the receiveship could incur significant liability
weighs in favor of the lender only using receiver's that are experienced
and capable of acting in a fashion that will minimize any potential
liability that may occur.
Related Articles:
Evicting
Under Rent Control Idiosyncrasies
& Other Things You Need to Know by
Donna LaPorte, Esq.
Commercial
Paper and Negotiable Instruments An
Overview by
Stefan Lawrence, Esq.